On 5/24/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On 5/24/06, Wolfgang Woehl <tito@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Tuesday 23 May 2006 12:25, Aaron Krister Johnson:
> > > On Wednesday 24 May 2006 8:28 am, Wolfgang Woehl wrote:
> > > > Got 2.6.16.16 from kernel.org. If I understood Lee right I could
> expect a
> > > > jackd with -p 64 -n 2 to work just fine but it doesn't. Loads of
> xruns.
> > > > What am I missing? What can I do to find out?
> > >
> > > Hi Wolfgang,
> > >
> > > I was banging my head against the wall with the same issue, but after a
> > > *long* Google search, I found that disabling acpi did the trick for me.
> >
> > Aaron thanks, I'll try that. You happen to know whether this is a
> motherboard
> > issue or is kernel's acpi just not there yet? What a shame, it's such a
> good
> > thing to save power :)
> >
> > --
> > Wolfgang
> >
>
> Hi,
> I'm just echoing Lee's inputs as someone who's been down the low
> latency path for a while now. I am currently using 2.6.16-gentoo-r2
> with no low latency patches. It works fine on my AMD64 hardware, at
> least for low work load low latency needs. I run at 64/2 on my HDSP
> 9652 and get no xruns doing mostly mixing and a very little recording.
> However I do require realtime-lsm be enabled and loaded. Without
> realtime-lsm all kernels on my machine, with or without Ingo's
> patches, cause xruns.
>
> I have not tried the pam enabled realtime methods as there doesn't
> seem to be any value spending the time to do it just yet.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
in 64 bit? What mobo? I've given up on ingo's patches on my 64 bit machine here.
Received on Wed May 24 12:15:02 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 24 2006 - 12:15:02 EEST