On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 05:42:36PM -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
> Given the very small amount of drift (53 ms / hour), we're talking about
> inserting maybe 1 sample per 30000. I submit that nobody will notice
> if you just insert a copy of an adjacent sample, and if you
> want better than that, interpolation between two adjacent
> samples would be even smoother.
I tried a more elaborate scheme some time ago (for Aeolus): instead
of just inserting on sample, replace N by N+1 samples using higher
order interpolation, with N up to 64. It could still be heard on some
sounds.
One way to resample accurately with ratios near to unity is to use
FFT based convolution to find the samples at fractional position
a/b and (a+1)/b, then interpolate linearly between those.
-- FA Follie! Follie! Delirio vano e' questo!Received on Fri Jun 9 12:15:01 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 09 2006 - 12:15:01 EEST