-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Shirkey schrieb:
>>
>> Maybe so but money is not the preliminary target.
>>
>
> It is if you use a commercial copyright.
>
is CC share alike attribution non-commercial THAT commercial?
>> There are hundreds of tracks made in the community allready, that do not
>> incorporate a single second of any previously published record. DJing is
>> not the only way to make music...
>>
>
> I have yet to hear a truly original piece from this community. Even if
> it is created with original recordings and samples. Everything I have
> listened to takes influence from the work of others or attempts to
> emulate a sound that has already been discovered (occasionally with
> excellent technical execution).
There IS a difference between playing in a style, that has been
developed before by others and taking the recordings of others and use
them as loops.
Even citing someones licks/riffs/harmonies is not an issue - a recording
comes straight from the person it has made it, to use it in large
chunks is no new interpretation the same as a new recording is.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFE4I7f1Aecwva1SWMRAvFiAJ4jkxOKP2TU48nrr2BOZJ3m8WayOQCbBJUi
mSuA2bNkgh0jlK2D0geDkmQ=
=Xr7Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Mon Aug 14 20:15:07 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 14 2006 - 20:15:07 EEST