On Sat August 19 2006 14:21, Jan Depner wrote:
> Qt is much better than wxWidgets. Unfortunately, for your
> use in a closed source package, you'd have to pay for the
Qt may be "better", but at this point it would require a
rewrite.... if you look at his original post, it includes a
screenshot of a working Windows version.
wx is free, even for proprietary software, and lets you write
Windows and Mac ports with native UI's. Qt may let you do those
things, and I personally much prefer it over wx for my own
coding, but it would not only cost him like $1100, it would
require he rewrite his app a second time.
Rob
Received on Sun Aug 20 00:15:02 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Aug 20 2006 - 00:15:02 EEST