On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 15:53 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 21:50 +0200, Lars Luthman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 12:45 -0700, Drucer Ninetynine wrote:
> > > http://www.linuxsampler.org/
> > >
> > > Nope, not dead :)
> >
> > http://www.linuxsampler.org/downloads.html
> >
> > Not open source.
> >
>
> Yes, it is open source (the source is avaliable - QED). It's not GPL or
> free software.
I suppose it depends on which definition you use. I prefer this one:
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php
So according to your definition it is, according to mine it isn't. No
disagreement.
-- Lars Luthman - please encrypt any email sent to me if possible PGP key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x04C77E2E Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 25 2006 - 00:15:09 EEST