On 8/24/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell@email-addr-hidden-job.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 21:50 +0200, Lars Luthman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 12:45 -0700, Drucer Ninetynine wrote:
> > > http://www.linuxsampler.org/
> > >
> > > Nope, not dead :)
> >
> > http://www.linuxsampler.org/downloads.html
> >
> > Not open source.
> >
>
> Yes, it is open source (the source is avaliable - QED). It's not GPL or
> free software.
>
> Lee
Yes, that's a reasonable clarification on my point. Thanks for keeping
me honest.
I continue to be curious if this was the product that caused them to
change the license from GPL to non-GPL. I've never heard.
Anyone wishing to can comment back privately if they would prefer.
Cheers,
Mark
Received on Fri Aug 25 00:15:10 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 25 2006 - 00:15:10 EEST