On 9/29/06, Nick Copeland <nickycopeland@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >Can [the ARP 2600] process external inputs?
>
> It is coded to do so, however this is one part that has not been tested, at
> all, so your millage will not exactly vary as it will probably be more like
> petrol into a diesel tank. I also think you will get different results from
> jack vs alsa drivers as they are organised differently within bristol.
>
> >feed an organ sound into an ARP patch for some Won't Get Fooled Again fun
> >:)
>
> That is currently not possible but is on the list of enhancements.
> Eventually bristol may register each synth as separate IO into jack, so you
> can then tie it all together as you like. The dirty workaround of invoking
> two bristol into jack will also fail as the name space 'bristol' may clash?
> I was considering putting the pid into the registration to avoid this issue,
> but that remains mildly ugly.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick.
Why not put the synth name in the IO port name? Unless you already
do, in which case I'm not sure what you mean by a namespace clash.
Received on Mon Oct 2 16:15:01 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Oct 02 2006 - 16:15:02 EEST