>
> "0 A.D. is (according to the current plans) going to be 'free' as in no cost,
> but not all 'Free' as in freedom (or even as in open source) (though some
> components are likely to be) - so it can't be called 'free software', and
> would probably not be accepted by GNU people."
Hmm thanks for that, couldn't find anything myself;)
Its one of those things, I am not even sure I have time to donate at the
moment as I am going in for another interview for a new audio engineer
job at a large complex that will be taking up a fair amount of my time
if I get it. No problem donating time if I have it, but I would rather
donate time to things that I think will benefit a large group, and since
I have received so much from open source returning to it is important to me.
I do hope the project succeeds though, and after I find out how much
time I have I may take another look at it if they can clarify their
positioning on the 'free'ness of it, in as far as what will or won't be
and reasoning.
Seablade
Received on Sun Nov 19 04:15:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 19 2006 - 04:15:05 EET