Folderol wrote:
> You are not comparing like for like. ARM processors raw number-crunch in
> FAR fewer clock cycles than x86 architecture. Typically 3x (I might
> be a little out of date with those figures).
Hmmm, so you're saying it should compare to something like a dual 900mhz
machine when running csound (or ams or zyn)?
That might be enough...
-- peace, love & harmony Atte http://www.atte.dk | quintet: http://www.anagrammer.dk | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositionsReceived on Thu Jan 11 04:15:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 11 2007 - 04:15:02 EET