Re: [linux-audio-user] sample rate question

From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la@email-addr-hidden-nerd.com>
Date: Sat Jan 20 2007 - 00:38:19 EET

Joshua Boyd wrote:

> Another option would be 88.2. Better quality that CD, but an even
> multiple with might reduce down sampling artifacts.

If you are using libsamplerate for downsamping, there will be no
discernable difference when doing 96k -> 44.2k as opposed to
88.2k -> 44.1k.

Erik

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it
from religious conviction."  -- Blaise Pascal, mathematician, 1670
Received on Sat Jan 20 04:15:01 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 20 2007 - 04:15:01 EET