Re: [linux-audio-user] Which distribution? (Used to be DeMuDi)

From: Asbjørn Sæbø <asbjs@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Feb 04 2007 - 16:58:39 EET

On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 03:43:43PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Asbjørn Sæbø hat gesagt: // Asbjørn Sæbø wrote:
>
> > DeMuDi, the distribution which I used to use, seems to have little
> > activity. Is is maintained in such a way that it is sensible to go with
> > it again? And if not so, what other suggestions do you have for a
> > distribution for audio work? (Studio64 is out of the question, as I
> > have no 64-bit hardware.) Simple low-latency setup is appreciated, as
> > is something Debian-based and quite up-to-date.
>
> 64 Studio also does a 32bit version:
> http://www.64studio.com/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
>
> Most of the work done on Demudi has flown back to Debian.
>
> "Choose Debian, it's the system that's here to stay!"

But then one would probably have to use testing, to keep up? Stable is
a good and stable distribution, but most of the time severely lagging
compared to current audio software, I would guess.

Asbjørn
Received on Sun Feb 4 20:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 04 2007 - 20:15:02 EET