Damon Chaplin wrote:
>I bought my first midi keyboard last week (a CME UF5), and it's great
>fun with the Reason demo in Windows. But I've spent hours and hours
>messing with about 4 different synths under Linux and each one failed
>(in a different way, of course!). That is absolutely ridiculous.
>
>
Yes, it is, and I'm sorry you can't get things going.
However, I checked the LAD and LAU mail lists, apparently you didn't
post messages regarding your troubles. It's tough to give you any
meaningful response if we don't know which synths didn't work for you
and what distro you're using. Did you contact the developers directly ?
And please, *of course* everything works in Windows. We know this, we've
heard it a gazillion times, and it remains eminently unhelpful. (Sorry,
Damon, I'm already in a bad mood: LJ won't fund my trip to LAC2007).
>It would also be nice if the LAD community could agree on an ideal audio
>architecture for the desktop. Otherwise GNOME & KDE may switch to new
>sound servers which still don't support pro-audio apps.
>
>
Given the interest and respect shown towards LAD by the GNOME and KDE
devels, I'd say we're more likely to witness pigs in self-powered flight.
The LAD community probably already has agreed on an ideal server (JACK).
What we need is good old industry clout, and we ain't got none. Not very
much anyway: Hardware manufacturers continue to ignore our existence,
the major publications see no reason to cover the Linux audio scene, and
even general Linux devels and users seem content and happy with the fact
that the music they like is almost entirely produced on proprietary
platforms and closed-source software.
The Linux sound & music communities have grown with virtually *no*
assistance from any commercial source, i.e., nothing from the distro
manufacturers or anywhere else. I don't like hyperbole, but in this case
it's justified: The work taken on by Linux audio developers is
Herculean, they're doing it with virtually no support anywhere,
including damned little from the general Linux community. For instance,
Slashdot recently ran an article on a new "OSS music composer", for
Windows, natch. It's as though they've simply decided there's no future
in Linux audio, so they'll just ignore it until it goes away. [insert
unfriendly suggestion to /. here]
Hell and damnation, I can't even get the Linux Journal to help out with
a trip to LAC, which implies to me that *it's just not important
enough*. We're talking about mere hundreds of dollars, not even close to
a grand, but they're not interested. Again I say, hell and damnation.
>What would be the ideal?
> o gstreamer/phonon -> sound server (e.g. pulseaudio) -> jack -> alsa?
> o merge jack code into pulseaudio?
> o Define an API for pro-audio apps to switch audio output to jack
> temporarily? (if jack isn't suited to running constantly)
> o something else?
>
Whatever, it should be based on JACK or its design principles, else
we'll just get more or less workable replacements for artsd and esd.
Today I have no good hopes for an audio-optimized general Linux desktop.
Tomorrow I might feel better about it all, but right now I really don't
see any organized effort to change the current situation.
Best,
dp
Received on Wed Feb 21 20:15:01 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 21 2007 - 20:15:02 EET