Re: [linux-audio-user] is jackmidi crucial? [was:] lv2dynparam

From: Ken Restivo <ken@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 02 2007 - 20:10:41 EET

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 06:40:15PM +0100, Atte Andr? Jensen wrote:
> Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
>
> >Having audio and MIDI perfectly synchronized is a must in my
> >vision. There is no point of using JACK if you use ALSA too.
>
> Really?
>
> I haven't yet used it, and think alsa midi works just fine. Exactly
> where (real world scenarios, please) is jack-midi superior the the
> degree that the current approach is pointless?
>
> And I'd also like to hear a quick hand up: Who's using jack midi
> exclusively and who's using alsa midi?
>

I use ALSA MIDI, with jack. It works. Though I've had problems with JACK SYNC in Rosegarden. Especially using the RTC/HPET. And especially when using jackmp (SMP version of jackd). Other JACK Sync programs appear to work fine, so I expect the problem is Rosegarden.

I have a firewire audio interface with one MIDI port on it. There is no ALSA support for firewire, so the MIDI interface uses JACK MIDI, and it works fine. Although it has a noticeable latency and lag compared to the ALSA MIDI, strangely enough.

I can live with ALSA MIDI until whenever JACK MIDI is complete.

- -ken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF6Gihe8HF+6xeOIcRAklCAKDSjWqaIv6iwTfyuLBrFh2OyDIidwCdFBxP
2NYNa6SPyGBsYw8yartCPiM=
=svBL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Sat Mar 3 00:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 03 2007 - 00:15:02 EET