Folderol wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:28:42 -0400
> "Ivica Ico Bukvic" <ico@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>>>> pattern with cognition. But even if we consider cognition as a point of
>>>> contention, the machinery has a purpose and a role and as such its
>>>> manifestation is not meaningless at all.
>>> It is different because a human being is listening to the drumming and
>>> choosing what sounds pleasing and what does not. A single rhythmic
>> This is all about psychoacoustics. What is pleasing/musical to me may not be
>> to you and vice-versa.
>
> Surely this sentence is the beginning and the end of the entire matter.
>
> I never attempt to analyse the music I enjoy, nor that which I compose
> myself. My experience is that the closer you try to examine something
> that moves you, the further away you get from it.
>
> I take the same attitude with all creative activities such as art,
> dance, prose & poetry. If I like it, then that's good. If I don't, well
> I know what not to see/hear.
that's very limiting... if I want to analyze it I will analyze it
whether I like it or not... not seeing music in math or math in music
makes for a poorer experience...
erik
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Apr 5 20:15:05 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 05 2007 - 20:15:06 EEST