On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 14:28:42 -0400
"Ivica Ico Bukvic" <ico@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > > pattern with cognition. But even if we consider cognition as a point of
> > > contention, the machinery has a purpose and a role and as such its
> > > manifestation is not meaningless at all.
> >
> > It is different because a human being is listening to the drumming and
> > choosing what sounds pleasing and what does not. A single rhythmic
>
> This is all about psychoacoustics. What is pleasing/musical to me may not be
> to you and vice-versa.
Surely this sentence is the beginning and the end of the entire matter.
I never attempt to analyse the music I enjoy, nor that which I compose
myself. My experience is that the closer you try to examine something
that moves you, the further away you get from it.
I take the same attitude with all creative activities such as art,
dance, prose & poetry. If I like it, then that's good. If I don't, well
I know what not to see/hear.
-- Will J G _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-userReceived on Thu Apr 5 00:15:05 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 05 2007 - 00:15:05 EEST