Re: [LAU] Re: Fwd: Hardware Choices

Hmm thanks for the link, will provide good reading, along with the summary.

               Seablade

On 7/22/07, Ken Restivo <ken@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 12:24:48PM -0500, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> > Mind being a bit more specific? As in no it will handle 4,8, or 16
> cores
> > well?
> >
> > Seablade
> >
> > On 7/20/07, Kjetil S. Matheussen <k.s.matheussen@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >"Thomas Vecchione" <seablaede@email-addr-hidden>
> > >>
> > >> I heard Jack (jackdmp?) could only take advantage of two cores right
> > >now?
> > >
> > >No.
> > >
> > >
>
> It is a long and somewhat involved (and, I got the impression, touchy and
> sensitive) topic.
>
> Paul and Stephane provided long, well-thought-out, and detailed
> explanations of the issues on the jackit-devel list earlier this year.
>
>
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=1176687721.10933.118.camel%40localhost.localdomain&forum_name=jackit-devel
>
> My (oversimplified) understanding is: jackdmp will use as many processors
> as you've got, but how well and how granular it does it, depends on how you
> have your chain of connections set up, and to what degree your application
> software (softsynths, effects processors, DAW's, sequencers, etc.) exploit
> those opportunities for parallelism internally.
>
> - -ken
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFGo7Cxe8HF+6xeOIcRAmw3AJ0VhtCH6vIqw+QifpW6S3ahWApbEACeOXUs
> KKQEAoBO30ddWEnDRlre/E4=
> =FxAQ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Jul 23 00:15:03 2007