Re: [LAU] Gumstix and jack, softsynths, etc?

From: Ken Restivo <ken@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jul 25 2007 - 02:03:03 EEST

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 11:03:50AM +0200, Pieter Palmers wrote:
> Ken Restivo wrote:
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Gah, if only they had an FPU.
> >
> >http://www.gumstix.com
> >
> >Is there anything roughly like it with an FPU and enough RAM to run jackd
> >and fluidsynth?
>
> Wasn't that what the Trinity guys were showing off at LAC?
>
> http://trinityaudiogroup.com/splash2007.html
>
> I wonder how things are there...
>
>

That looks really neat, but it is way overkill for what I'm trying to do-- I doing neither field recording nor X, only running headless softsynths.

What "Fanless Low Power CPU 500 Mhz - 256 RAM" are they using exactly? Is it based on a project board like the gumstix? Obviously that CPU has enough floating-point cohones to run JACK and Ardour.

What I'm looking for is merely a project CPU that has sufficient resources to run JACK and fluidsynth, and maybe some other softsynths like Elven/AZR3 which I use a lot too. If it's open so I can build an expansion board with one or two USB host ports and an audio chip, then I've got a digital synthesizer. Somewhere in a parts drawer around here I have an LCD display just waiting to be used too, so if it has GPIO pins then the thing can have a user interface too.

Anyway, this is the kind of thing that has a "market" of exactly one: me. But seems like all the components necessary to build such a thing are extant. Or are they?

- -ken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGpoUne8HF+6xeOIcRAqznAKDGhWXxkZLaGSqTE6DFEoPAsOlTnQCfR3Hc
ECZRL7kNpphkUqBUCm+PXgg=
=T7e6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Jul 25 04:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jul 25 2007 - 04:15:02 EEST