Re: [LAU] Goodbye ReplyTo munging...

From: Matthias Schönborn <mbs1303@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Aug 14 2007 - 12:49:16 EEST

On Tuesday 14 August 2007 10:47:40 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:59:01PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > Oh great, now filtering is broken, because I only get one copy of the
> > message, the one sent to my email, while the "list copy" does not get
> > sent to me, so filtering by List-Id (which is default on many email
> > clients, both desktop- and web-based) does not work.
>
> If you don't receive the message _from the list_ that is probably
> the result of your filters. A message posted on the list is sent
> to all, including the poster if (s)he is a member of the list.
>
> ++votes for the current situation, i.e. no munging.
> Using mutt here, it has Reply, Reply-to-all and Reply-to-list.
> If the latter is missing on some mail clients it should just
> be added.

I'm happier with the current situation, too! I'm using KMail and my filters
still work fine, and there's a reply-to-list button, too. When I joined the
list I was really confused that replies would be sent to the whole list,
instead of to the author of the post. With munging off it is more intuitive.

Anyway, I don't understand why some people make such a fuzz about it. Is it so
hard to get used to the new settings, even if it's the standard setting among
mailinglists?
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Aug 14 16:15:04 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 14 2007 - 16:15:04 EEST