Re: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation

From: Kevin Cosgrove <kevinc@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Aug 30 2007 - 18:11:27 EEST

On 30 August 2007 at 0:46, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> But whatever approach you use, if it is capable of tracking
> tempo changes it will be a form of PLL, but maybe in disguise.

Like maybe a DLL? I'm not sure what the coding difficulty
differences would be between PLL & DLL. Maybe it's worth asking
that question tho.

--
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user

Received on Thu Aug 30 20:15:02 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Rui Nuno Capela: "Re: [LAU] getting started with qjackctl and Linux Sampler..."
Previous message: Preston Callison: "[LAU] getting started with qjackctl and Linux Sampler..."
Maybe in reply to: Folderol: "[LAU] Progressive Quantisation"
Next in thread: Fons Adriaensen: "Re: [LAU] Progressive Quantisation"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Aug 30 2007 - 20:15:02 EEST