Re: [LAU] [ANN] JAD 1.0 officially released

From: tim hall <tech@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Sep 17 2007 - 14:14:59 EEST

Dave Phillips wrote:
> david wrote:
>
>> .... I wonder how it compares to pure:bolic, dyne:bolic, Musix, Ubuntu
>> Studio, Studio64, or what other's I forgot to include?
>
> I'm writing such an article now for Linux Pro magazine.
>
> However, I'm finding it slow-going. Comparing 32-bit JAD and 64-bit 64
> Studio is unfair on various levels. They do share the common factor of
> being easy to install and configure, but there are significant
> differences after that. There are also many unique features I like about
> each distro.

Yes, you would be better off comparing JAD to the 32bit version of 64
Studio. However, I have a rough idea of what your partitioning schemes
already look like and I don't blame you for not installing both. ;)

cheers,

tim
/|\
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Sep 17 16:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 17 2007 - 16:15:02 EEST