Re: [LAU] difference between realtime-kernel and low-latency-kernel?

From: Philipp Ãœberbacher <hollunder@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Oct 02 2007 - 15:29:09 EEST

Afaik it was more or less experimental and you had to add it yourself
but it worked really well.
There is a realtime kernel by default in gutsy.

On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:33:07 +0200
Matthias Schönborn <mbs1303@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Hey list,
>
> I've just read that there's a difference between a realtime-kernel
> and the low-latency-kernel provided by ubuntustudio. The text in the
> german wiki on ubuntuusers.de said, that a realtime-kernel is
> slightly better than the lowlatencykernel
> (http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/Echtzeitkernel) - then why isn't it used
> in ubuntustudio? Or do I just mix something up?
>
> Regards
> Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Oct 2 16:15:02 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 02 2007 - 16:15:02 EEST