Re: [LAU] Software or performance?

From: Mark Constable <markc@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sun Dec 02 2007 - 07:56:12 EET

On 2007-12-02 03:54 pm, Folderol wrote:
> For those who don't know, for some time I've made available all the
> voice patches I've created for ZynAddSubFX.
>
> However, for the first time I've been asked what license they are
> under, which presents a curious problem.
>
> Would these be best regarded as 'software'? - in which case I'd go for
> GPL2 or later, or are they more like a 'performance'? - where I would
> then go for creative commons BY-SA
>
> I'd be interested in peoples opinions.

FWIW there is an example of a gpl license with exception at the
bottom of this posting...

 http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-audio-users/msg48475.html

--markc
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Dec 2 08:15:03 2007

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 02 2007 - 08:15:03 EET