Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5

On Thursday 24 January 2008 10:02:03 Matthias Schönborn wrote:
> I realised that when using 128 Frames per Period instead of 64, it works
> perfectly. At least it did for like three hours yesterday evening. It's a
> great tool for composing, I think!
>
> See below for the output.

Thanks for your report. I've just released klick 0.6, containing the fix for
this crash, and many other JACK transport related improvements.

http://das.nasophon.de/klick/

Dominic

> (gdb) thread apply all bt
>
> Thread 2 (process 5965):
> #0 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
> #1 0xb7d05e96 in nanosleep () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> #2 0xb7d3fb3c in usleep () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
> #3 0x0804ab80 in Klick::run (this=0x807a008) at klick.cc:174
> #4 0x0804a8bb in main (argc=8, argv=0xbffc1784) at main.cc:39
>
> Thread 1 (process 5968):
> #0 0x08051ce6 in AudioInterface::process_mix_samples (this=0x807a138,
> dest=0xb7c24000, src=0x807b8f8,
> length=2122, volume=1) at audio_interface.cc:197
> #1 0x08051ef2 in AudioInterface::process_mix (this=0x807a138,
> buffer=0xb7c13a00, nframes=64)
> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
> at audio_interface.cc:181
> #2 0x08051ff9 in AudioInterface::process_callback_ (nframes=64,
> arg=0x807a138) at audio_interface.cc:139
> #3 0xb7f81f09 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libjack.so.0
> #4 0x00000040 in ?? ()
> #5 0x0807a138 in ?? ()
> #6 0x000003e8 in ?? ()
> #7 0x00000003 in ?? ()
> #8 0x00000000 in ?? ()
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Jan 28 04:15:06 2008