On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 09:33 +0900, '2+ wrote:
> thank you all!
> i sit in front of my linux machine once a week
> so .. maybe by next time jack will be updated to solve the problem? ;-D
> ( if not will try what HTH told me ;-) )
>
> but i still wonder what the SC@email-addr-hidden style will be in the near future.
> if SC sticks to use jack insted of pulseaudio
> a lazy set-up person like me will fall into trouble
> when hardy becomes totally portaudio oriented?
> or SC-ppl just disable pulse and just keep on using jack?
>
> or something like jack@email-addr-hidden may happen?
There is a jack module for pulse. I ahve installed it and used it
successfully in the past but it seems to slow things down. Maybe things
have improved since then, as I compiled and set it up middle of last
year sometime.
Shelagh
> if yes to this
> mpg321 with SC mixed via pulse may available?
>
> is pulse a good thing for us? or more much more trouble making?
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Jan 31 04:15:16 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 04:15:16 EET