Re: [LAU] reiser4.... has it a place for audio?

From: cdr <_@email-addr-hidden-your.name>
Date: Sat May 03 2008 - 02:53:22 EEST

> > These days the choice of filesystem should make no significant
> > difference. Certainly it won't matter if an -rt kernel is used.
> >
>
> Well, doesn't reiserfs use quite a lot more cpu than ext3? I think
> that may make a significant difference...

yes., at least reiser4.

it also gets things done (untarring) much faster as well, at the price of occasional:

'freezes' for 1/2 to 2 seconds from time to time (completely unacceptable for audio)

during delayed tree balancing or block writing/allocation or something

also rm -rf is very slow.

for certain niche cases, its a fantastic filesystem.

unless youre creating hundreds/thousands of files a minute (eg, busy Maildir host, or VFS-backed database that dont use a monolithic file (a la git, not berk or MySQL)), i wouldnt bother..

> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat May 3 08:15:05 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 03 2008 - 08:15:05 EEST