Chris Cannam wrote:
> On 03/05/2008, David Baron <d_baron@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> The Sourceforge .deb (Debian) requires libl0 which is incompatible with other
>> recent packages which now use libl0ldbl.
>
> Just out of interest -- can you explain that, please? I haven't
> actually tried to use the package you're mentioning, but I'm intrigued
> by your cryptic remark.
>
> I assume you mean liblo0 rather than libl0, but what does "ldbl" stand
> for? The current Ubuntu package appears to be (still) called liblo0.
>
i am puzzled too.
btw, fyi, the .deb in sourceforge.net has no librubberband support, so
no pitch-shifting available from it
byee
-- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela rncbc@email-addr-hidden _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sun May 4 04:15:02 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 04 2008 - 04:15:02 EEST