Re: [LAU] [LAA] [ANN] jack-keyboard 2.5

From: Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue May 20 2008 - 20:38:58 EEST

On 0520T1747, Florian Schmidt wrote:
> > > Starting a jack daemon just to be able to send some midi to some midi
> > > device is maybe a burden sometimes..
> >
> > Yes. However, well-behaved JACK clients should afaik start jackd
> > automatically. jack-keyboard does that since version 2.4.
>
> Yes, that doesn't mean that it works though. Scenario: I have a computer with
> a midi interface on the soundcard. Wanna send Midi through it? Should the
> MIDI signal go through hoops (jackd).. Should the user go through hoops
> (setting up jackd)?
>
> > > I like the idea of jack midi for internal
> > > routing between applications, especially between Sequencers and
> > > Softsynths. It lightens the burden on softsynth and sequencer
> > > implementers which would otherwise have to take into account all kinds of
> > > scheduling and priorityu issues. But MIDI also has more purposes than
> > > that..
> >
> > Sure it does. But what makes ALSA MIDI more suitable for that purpose?
>
> Zero added latency for one. jackd only makes sense for inter-process delivery
> of MIDI signals. For inter-machine sending of midi where the other machine
> might be a hardware synth, it doesn't make sense at all to send the signal
> through another daemon..

Ok, you convinced me. I'll finish splitting jack-keyboard.c into
jack-dependent and jack-independent parts and then let you know about
how it looks like.

-- 
If you cut off my head, what would I say?  Me and my head, or me and my body?
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed May 21 00:15:03 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 21 2008 - 00:15:03 EEST