>Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:16:54 +0100
>From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Nettingsmeier?= <nettings@folkwang-hochschule.de>
>
>Svend-Erik Kjær Madsen wrote:
>> On tir, 2009-01-27 at 15:49 +0100, Cassiel wrote:
>>> My computerbased setup is 2.9ms latency with a Terratec EWS88MT, may I
>>> sent you a video to document this?
>>>
>>> regards
>>> r
>>
>> You don't have to, I own a RME Multiface wich I can squize down to 0.67
>> ms working in 96000Hz
>
>please, for every such number published, 10 newbies think they must tune
>their system to death in order to be "professional".
i agree that such a consequence would be unfortunate and unnecessary.
>unless you have been locked-in for years and have been playing your
>instruments via neural lace, such latencies are totally unimportant for
>practical work.
yes, but it is fun to see how far we can push things before they break.
-- .pltk. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Tue Jan 27 20:15:04 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 27 2009 - 20:15:04 EET