Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?)

From: plutek-infinity <plutek@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Jan 27 2009 - 17:23:34 EET

>Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:16:54 +0100
>From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Nettingsmeier?= <nettings@folkwang-hochschule.de>
>
>Svend-Erik Kjær Madsen wrote:
>> On tir, 2009-01-27 at 15:49 +0100, Cassiel wrote:
>>> My computerbased setup is 2.9ms latency with a Terratec EWS88MT, may I
>>> sent you a video to document this?
>>>
>>> regards
>>> r
>>
>> You don't have to, I own a RME Multiface wich I can squize down to 0.67
>> ms working in 96000Hz
>
>please, for every such number published, 10 newbies think they must tune
>their system to death in order to be "professional".

i agree that such a consequence would be unfortunate and unnecessary.

>unless you have been locked-in for years and have been playing your
>instruments via neural lace, such latencies are totally unimportant for
>practical work.

yes, but it is fun to see how far we can push things before they break.

-- 
.pltk.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Jan 27 20:15:04 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 27 2009 - 20:15:04 EET