Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?)

From: plutek-infinity <plutek@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Jan 27 2009 - 17:20:14 EET

>From: Svend-Erik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kj=E6r?= Madsen <sv-e@email-addr-hidden-e.dk>
>Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:06:39 +0100
>
>On tir, 2009-01-27 at 15:49 +0100, Cassiel wrote:
>> My computerbased setup is 2.9ms latency with a Terratec EWS88MT, may I
>> sent you a video to document this?
>>
>> regards
>> r
>
>You don't have to, I own a RME Multiface wich I can squize down to 0.67
>ms working in 96000Hz

interesting -- i also work with a Multiface, and find that Jack will
not start at anything less than 64 frames/period and 2 frames/buffer,
which is 1.33ms latency at 96kHz. i didn't think 32 frames/period was
possible with that hardware -- what's your jack command-line?

thanks... cheers!

-- 
.pltk.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Jan 27 20:15:04 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 27 2009 - 20:15:04 EET