Re: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >= 2.6.27 RT ETA?)

From: plutek-infinity <plutek@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Jan 27 2009 - 17:40:44 EET

>From: Svend-Erik =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kj=E6r?= Madsen <sv-e@email-addr-hidden-e.dk>

>On tir, 2009-01-27 at 10:20 -0500, plutek-infinity wrote:
>> >You don't have to, I own a RME Multiface wich I can squize down to 0.67
>> >ms working in 96000Hz
>>
>> interesting -- i also work with a Multiface, and find that Jack will
>> not start at anything less than 64 frames/period and 2 frames/buffer,
>> which is 1.33ms latency at 96kHz. i didn't think 32 frames/period was
>> possible with that hardware -- what's your jack command-line?
>>
>> thanks... cheers!
>>
>>
>
>Hi
>
>It's the soundcard that works in 96000Hz Jack is working with 192000Hz
>and 64frames.

ah. thanks for clarifying. that works here, too -- but i'm not sure
why i'd want to! ;-)

cheers!

-- 
.pltk.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Jan 27 20:15:05 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 27 2009 - 20:15:05 EET