Re: [LAU] Bpm detection/quantize

From: Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Feb 11 2009 - 00:11:35 EET

On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:53:07PM -0200, surian wrote:

> hey, why such anger Fons?

It's not anger, and don't take my comments personally.
 
> I really don't see it as a defect (it's just a fact).
> The music is beautiful and makes me want to use it.

Re-using music, or parts of it, is probably as old as
music itself, and until music became very big business
(it was business before, but not in that way), people
were usually honoured when it happened as long as the
result was attributed to the original composer.

But. Adding a ostinate beat to music that was never
designed to have such a beat has IMHO never produced
anything of value. In the best case it creates an
effect of 'alienation', but it's an effect, no more.
Which means it's surprising the first time, much less
so the second, and just boring from the third time you
hear it.

> If you don't like that people remix <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remix>
> the others work what you think of linux?

I don't see the relation.

-- 
FA
Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 11 00:15:03 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 11 2009 - 00:15:03 EET