Re: [LAU] Bpm detection/quantize

From: Chris Cannam <cannam@email-addr-hidden-day-breakfast.com>
Date: Thu Feb 12 2009 - 00:07:40 EET

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Chris Cannam
<cannam@email-addr-hidden-day-breakfast.com> wrote:
> I actually find this goal more distasteful than the one Fons is objecting to.

("Distasteful" is probably too strong. I don't really object to it.
I just found it interesting that the automatic accompaniment goal
should be cited as the acceptable reverse of the unacceptable audio
quantization goal. I don't see it that way.)

Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 12 00:15:03 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 12 2009 - 00:15:03 EET