Re: [LAU] Bpm detection/quantize

From: Chris Cannam <cannam@email-addr-hidden-day-breakfast.com>
Date: Thu Feb 12 2009 - 00:03:15 EET

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:01 AM, Frank Barknecht <fbar@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> Beat and rhythm detection also is a hot topic for many years in the
> academic music scene as it's a necessary prerequisite to let a
> computer play along with human performers, ideally in real time.

I actually find this goal more distasteful than the one Fons is objecting to.

I can understand why people are interested in automatic accompaniment,
but mangling human-made music to fit a specific timing map seems like
a more proper goal to me -- "manufactured" being somehow preferable to
"simulated". (I think this may be an "uncanny valley" situation -- if
you haven't met this term before, look it up.)

Chris
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 12 00:15:03 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 12 2009 - 00:15:03 EET