Re: [LAU] Bpm detection/quantize

From: david <gnome@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Feb 12 2009 - 12:14:23 EET

Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:26:25AM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
>> Oh, and btw: It's interesting that in this thread there are complains
>> when a computer is used to add a beat to music while in another thread
>> the addition of reverb to music seems to be no problem at all.
>
> It's two very different things really:
>
> Emulation of natural reverb can be compared to generating
> drum or percussion sounds electronically or by software.
>
> Which is quitea different from adding such sounds to music
> that doesn't have them, usually for good reasons.
>
>> I know a lot of natural rooms that give a much more beautiful
>> reverberation than any digital allpass network can generate. ;)
>
> So do I, and I usually also prefer real percussion over
> its synthesised version.

I always prefer real percussion over synthesized. Humans don't usually
play music in rigid lock-step tempos, but with subtle changes as they go
along that help produce the total effect of the music.

-- 
David
gnome@email-addr-hidden
authenticity, honesty, community
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 12 16:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 12 2009 - 16:15:02 EET