Re: [LAU] Bpm detection/quantize

From: alex stone <compose59@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Feb 12 2009 - 12:16:44 EET

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Fons Adriaensen <fons@email-addr-hiddenwrote:

> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:26:25AM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> > Oh, and btw: It's interesting that in this thread there are complains
> > when a computer is used to add a beat to music while in another thread
> > the addition of reverb to music seems to be no problem at all.
>
> It's two very different things really:
>
> Emulation of natural reverb can be compared to generating
> drum or percussion sounds electronically or by software.
>
> Which is quitea different from adding such sounds to music
> that doesn't have them, usually for good reasons.
>
>
> > I know a lot of natural rooms that give a much more beautiful
> > reverberation than any digital allpass network can generate. ;)
>
> So do I, and I usually also prefer real percussion over
> its synthesised version.
>
> Ciao,
>
>
> --
> FA
>
> Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
> Parma, Italia
>
> O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
> E guerra e morte !
>

I'll echo Fon's comments about reverb............

Alex.

>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

-- 
Parchment Studios (It started as a joke...)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Feb 12 16:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 12 2009 - 16:15:02 EET