Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> As some of you know, I've had nothing but trouble with Ubuntu's rt
>> kernel, specifically 2.6.27-3-rt from the current repos. As a result
>> I've been working in non-realtime, and I'm not happy about it.
>> ...
>>
>
> I guess I could use a little more info before I even suggest a path
> for you to take. when you say the "Ubuntu rt kernel" is this just the
> standard rt kernel but supplied by Ubuntu, or is this an Ubuntu kernel
> (i.e. - a kernel.org kernel patched with Ubuntu patches) and then
> further patched with the rt stuff?
>
Hi Mark,
According to its Synaptic entry the 2.6.27-3-rt kernel is built from the
2.6.27 sources with Ingo Molnar's patch for 2.6.25.5-rt9.
> My #1 suggestion is to make sure you are just using the standard rt
> kernel. I had a bit of trouble with 2.6.25-rt so I stayed with 2.6.24
> for a while and just recently moved to 2.6.26.8-rt12 which is working
> fine for me but did require that I reconfigure it from scratch instead
> of using make oldconfig so building it was a little more painful. It's
> working well though.
>
>
I don't mind the configuration, even though it's been a while. I can
hack it. :)
> I guess it's just me but I don't understand the motivation for
> running the newest rt kernel. I upgrade every 2-3 major kernel
> revisions these days, or when I hear about a major bug, security
> issue, etc. I used 2.6.21, 24 and now 26.
>
>
I'll be pleased to have *any* working rt kernel on this system.
Btw, will I still need the LAU list patch for ALSA ?
Best,
dp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Feb 14 20:15:05 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Feb 14 2009 - 20:15:05 EET