Re: [LAU] pulseaudio issues [was Re: jackdbus issues: a workaround ? (Was: more jack/qjackctl madness)]

From: Hartmut Noack <zettberlin@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed May 20 2009 - 00:18:41 EEST

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul Davis schrieb:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:49 AM, alex stone <compose59@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> This is, i believe, at the heart of the problem.
>>
>> As a user looking in from the outside, it appears odd that the pulse
>> team didn't jump onboard with jack,
>
> "they" (i.e. Lennart) know all about JACK. JACK and Pulse superfically
> some similarities ("sound server") but at a deeper level have almost
> diametrically opposed goals.

Do you think, that Jack and Pulse could see each other as perfect
abstractions:
Pulse sees Jackd as just another "soundcard"-Port it can deliver its
stream to - the same as it does with alsa
Jackd sees Pulse as just another application that delivers a stream -
the same as it is related to Zyandd or Ardour
?

Or would realtime-issues in Pulse still destabilize Jackd if Pulse runs
as a jack-client?

best regs

HZN
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkoTIjEACgkQ1Aecwva1SWPLWQCfTfbaNFHp59GK1J45lmCTqqtY
cckAnioCH9Um1iqkQmoWZQlHHUUhBU21
=NKhH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed May 20 04:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 20 2009 - 04:15:05 EEST