On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:18:57AM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009 23:40:50 Fons Adriaensen wrote:
> > One poster mentioned foh use. What functionality would be
> > required in that case ? Note that it's generally a bad
> > idea to drive a PA system to its limits.
>
> That was me:-)
>
> Me dreamiest dream is something like that (given hardware that has the needed
> inputs and outputs (which I have:-P ) ):
>
> Some kind of PA-managment that does:
> a.1) Frequency-X-over and EQ (and phase and that)
> a.2) If EQ is to simple nowadays (as some Fons guy tells me:), sophisticated
> digital filters...
> b) Multiband-compressor (one per output or with independant frequency ranges)
> and limiters for the outputs.
> c) Automatic (and live!) comparison of the input signal that is routed to the
> outputs and the signal from one or more measurement microphones to adapt to
> the room with only a mouse-click. And to re-adapt to the room when the crowd
> is in.
> d) Feedback-destroyer (which will probably be hard to do while c) is running
> its adaption.
>
> And of course nice spec-views like in japa and as low as possible builtin
> delay.
>
> Sounds almost to easy, does it? :-)
>
I know a local DJ event where the sound guy just crushes the mixer output before the mains. I've seen board tapes of the event, and it's just a big black squiggly bloc-- everything within like 95% of max.
It sure is loud. Dancers love it.
-ken
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Aug 7 12:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Aug 07 2009 - 12:15:04 EEST