On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Davis<paul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> so as usual, it all depends on context. Live is a wickedly good
> program, created from a very great vision, and with very great skill.
> But its one program among many, one tool in a toolbox, and its not
> the answer to any and every music software problem. even one of its
> originators told me that if you were actually an audio engineer rather
> than a musician, and/or were doing straight tracking of live
> musicians, then although Live would work, it would probably not be the
> best tool choice.
That's precisely my point I was saying earlier. :-) If I were doing
more loop-based music, I'd be all over something like Live (or some
Linux approximation), but I am doing progressive heavy metal and
orchestral/symphonic music, so Live (or some Linux approximation)
would not work so well doing that. Not saying that kind of music
*can't* be done using something like Live, it's just not really suited
for it (at least going by what I read on the website), whereas
traditional DAW & sequencer apps work very well for that.
-- Brett
------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden;
If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Sep 1 20:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 20:15:03 EEST