Re: [LAU] Ext3 or JFS (or other) for linux audio?

From: Ray Rashif <schivmeister@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Sep 07 2009 - 16:22:52 EEST

2009/9/7 Ray Rashif <schivmeister@email-addr-hidden>

> JFS is low-latency, low-power, and all-around performer. As such, it suits
> a mobile platform with 5400RPM disks.
>

Oops, forgot to continue:

For speedier and larger disks, ext3/4. Both XFS and ReiserFS have their
cons. Google and you'll land upon a pretty old review, but JFS and EXT3 come
up ahead of the others.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Sep 7 20:15:02 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 07 2009 - 20:15:02 EEST