On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 01:04:11AM +0300, cunnilinux himself wrote:
> > I'm looking at this same question myself, but with one additional
> > constraint: Support on the Mac OSX platform - I frequently share my projects
> > with a collaborator who has one. A quick search turned up several people
> > who are just *beginning* to develop ext4 support for OSX.
>
> so, there are three options for you:
> (1) ext3 support implemented for mac os x
> (2) hfs+ support implemented for linux
> (3) ntfs-3g implemented for both (and windoze, naturally)
> /* there is also fat, but it's not a filesystem at all :-D */
I've recently had difficulties with hfs+. I used the debian
package hfsprogs, including fsck.hfsplus to manage an
external hfs+ formatted USB drive. The drive would
often get shut down in a "dirty" state, limiting me to
read-only access.
fsck.hfsplus -p would reset the "dirty" flag when it worked,
but it worked only intermittently. More often the process would
hang without releasing the device. This is with a recent
kernel and bleeding-edge (sid, unstable) debian
distribution.
I wouldn't be concerned about speed so much as being
interoperable.
> seems like you want the fastest option. unfortunately, i don't know which one.
>
> --
> sex, bike, open source!
-- Joel Roth _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Wed Sep 9 04:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 09 2009 - 04:15:03 EEST