Re: [LAU] which audio synthesis environment?

Atte Andre Jensen wrote:
> Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>
>
>> And why do you use Chuck Atte?
>>
>
> At first I was fascinated by the live coding capabilities, but in the
> end I never practiced enough to actually be able to do it live :-(
>
> What kept me in the loop was the very clear and well laid out
> documentation which in some way fitted well with where I came from in
> programming.
>
> What I love now are the algorithmic possibilities and the fact it's so
> easy to build your environment with OOP.
>
> However I'm reaching the limits performance wise. I almost finished a
> csound backend for my setup that let's me migrate cpu heavy parts (only
> sound generation) to csound. That might be my future solution.
>
> Otherwise I sometimes wish I learned supercollider in stead, since it
> seems to perform better and has some nifty tricks up its sleeve. I study
> supercollider in my spare time, but my live setup in chuck works and
> migrating 2 hours of interactive, algoritmic music is not a quick task
> however sleek the environment or how well you know it :-(
>
>
And why don't you use puredata, with csound for example?

\r

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Sep 11 16:15:01 2009