Re: [LAU] which audio synthesis environment?

On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:06:10 +0200
Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Atte Andre Jensen wrote:
> > Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> >
> >
> >> why Csound backend and not SuperCollider?
> >>
> >
> > I was so excited about this that I started browsing and found these:
> >
> > pd:
> > http://www.halftheory.com/hetleveiker/pdvst.html
> > http://www-crca.ucsd.edu/~jsarlo/pdvst/
> >
> > csound:
> > http://www.csounds.com/manual/html/CommandCsoundVST.html
> >
> > They all seem windows-ish to me, but given the cross platform
> > nature of both projects, it might not be far fetched to have it
> > going under linux.
> >
> > I asked on both the pd list and the csound list for input on the
> > current status of running them as native linux vst plugins, I'll
> > get back with any followups here.
> >
> > NB: A quick google search seems suggest that super collider is not
> > this far in this regard (being used as vst plugin) :-(
> >
> Thanks for searching.
> In my search to an environment I got the feeling that SuperCollider
> is a more modern language, a language for the future so to say. It's
> better suitable to compete those VST plugins maybe...
> I can see that is seems to be more easy to make a PD gui, but this
> should be possible with SC too right? Don't know if the language is
> ready for that yet.
> Please post also a message to the SC mailinglist, then you get a more
> general/objective view...
>
> Regards,
>
> \r

Isn't one of those languages already able to spit out various plug-in
formats and/or at least C code? Was it csound, supercollider or chuck?

Philipp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Sep 14 00:15:04 2009