Atte Andre Jensen wrote:
> Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>
>
>> In my search to an environment I got the feeling that SuperCollider is a
>> more modern language, a language for the future so to say.
>>
>
> I tend to agree. However don't dismiss either pd or csound too early.
> They are both very powerful pieces of software, that let's you do very,
> very deep stuff. Each has it's advantages (enough for many a flame war),
> granted, but still, all are very powerful.
>
>
>> It's better
>> suitable to compete those VST plugins maybe...
>> I can see that is seems to be more easy to make a PD gui, but this
>> should be possible with SC too right? Don't know if the language is
>> ready for that yet.
>>
>
> May I ask if you checked out any of the grand three and the baby one
> (csound, pd, super collider and chuck)?
>
> If not, I have to repeat the almost generic advise often given here: Get
> your feet a little bit wet with each (do a tutorial, for instance) to
> get a quick overview of what they can do and how they feel.
>
> Then pick one, stick wíth it, work with it, live with it, create music
> in it. Even if you later find you should switch, you'll have a much
> better idea what you need what you don't need, and it's not that much
> trouble to learn the next one.
>
Thanks for the advices. I tried pd a bit and SC. I think I like to work
with SC more, but I have to say, I'm just in the beginning of the process.
>
>> Please post also a message to the SC mailinglist, then you get a more
>> general/objective view...
>>
>
> Done.
>
>
Thanks, let's wait and see.
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Sep 14 00:15:05 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Sep 14 2009 - 00:15:05 EEST