Hi Dave!
I have a dual core laptop and using Jack2 has brought an increase in
performance. I use compiled Jack2 and Jack apps from the packaging system.
Carlo
Dave Phillips wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> 64 Studio 2.1 is a wonderfully stable and reliable system, one I've used
> profitably for quite a long time now. Alas, it's definitely out-of-date,
> and its version of JACK is the lamentable 0.109.2, and it's causing some
> problems with AVSynthesis that I'd like to finally resolve by upgrading
> JACK.
>
> I have 64 Studio 3.0 beta on my laptop, but I don't plan to upgrade the
> production machine until 3.0 reaches a stable public release. Meanwhile
> I'll be pleased if I can safely upgrade some of its components.
>
> Here's the question: I've successfully compiled JACK 0.116.2 and JACK2
> 1.9.3, so in the opinions of my fellow LAUyers, which is the better
> choice for this system ? If I move to JACK2 will I need to recompile my
> JACK-savvy apps ? (That's not usually a problem.)
>
> I await the dawn. :)
>
> Best,
>
> dp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Sep 23 20:15:03 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 23 2009 - 20:15:04 EEST