Re: [LAU] need some advice before upgrading JACK

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 06:30:50PM +0200, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
> Hi Dave!
>
> I have a dual core laptop and using Jack2 has brought an increase in
> performance. I use compiled Jack2 and Jack apps from the packaging system.
>
> Carlo
>
> Dave Phillips wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > 64 Studio 2.1 is a wonderfully stable and reliable system, one I've used
> > profitably for quite a long time now. Alas, it's definitely out-of-date,
> > and its version of JACK is the lamentable 0.109.2, and it's causing some
> > problems with AVSynthesis that I'd like to finally resolve by upgrading
> > JACK.
> >
> > I have 64 Studio 3.0 beta on my laptop, but I don't plan to upgrade the
> > production machine until 3.0 reaches a stable public release. Meanwhile
> > I'll be pleased if I can safely upgrade some of its components.
> >
> > Here's the question: I've successfully compiled JACK 0.116.2 and JACK2
> > 1.9.3, so in the opinions of my fellow LAUyers, which is the better
> > choice for this system ? If I move to JACK2 will I need to recompile my
> > JACK-savvy apps ? (That's not usually a problem.)

Does anyone know if jack2 is being packaged yet for any .deb distros?

-Eric Rz.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user