Re: [LAU] need some advice before upgrading JACK

From: Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <eric@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Sep 30 2009 - 15:25:39 EEST

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:43:01AM -0500, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 06:30:50PM +0200, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
> > Hi Dave!
> > I have a dual core laptop and using Jack2 has brought an increase in
> > performance. I use compiled Jack2 and Jack apps from the packaging system.
> > Dave Phillips wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > > 64 Studio 2.1 is a wonderfully stable and reliable system, one I've used
> > > profitably for quite a long time now. Alas, it's definitely out-of-date,
> > > and its version of JACK is the lamentable 0.109.2, and it's causing some
> > > problems with AVSynthesis that I'd like to finally resolve by upgrading
> > > JACK.
> > > I have 64 Studio 3.0 beta on my laptop, but I don't plan to upgrade the
> > > production machine until 3.0 reaches a stable public release. Meanwhile
> > > I'll be pleased if I can safely upgrade some of its components.
> > > choice for this system ? If I move to JACK2 will I need to recompile my
> > > JACK-savvy apps ? (That's not usually a problem.)
>
> Does anyone know if jack2 is being packaged yet for any .deb distros?

Answering my own question, studio64 has a jack2 package and it is
probably going to be uploaded to debian experimental soonish.

-Eric Rz.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Sep 30 16:15:13 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 30 2009 - 16:15:13 EEST