On 10/10/2009 09:06 PM, hollunder@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:51:50 +0800
> Ray Rashif<schivmeister@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>
>>> they're more interested in porting lmms to window
>>> than to fix jack issues
>>>
>> No, the Windows port was a byproduct partly made possible by Qt4 :)
>> The JACK issue was there from the beginning, I had approached them
>> some 2 years ago to whine (thinking it was PEBKAC). It's something
>> they don't really have a solution to, so someone can enlighten them
>> or send in a patch.
>>
> Sure it was made possible by Qt4, point is that they put more effort
> into porting it to windows than to fix existing issues, and there
> really are plenty, not only jack related. In my eyes it's a mountain of
> bugs held together by a shiny GUI.
> Of course coming from someone who doesn't write any useful software
> that could be seen as an offence, but it should not be taken personal.
>
I haven't had a chance to try out lmms yet. What are the main show
stoppers apart from the jack issue that you encountered?
Cheers.
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Oct 10 16:15:01 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 10 2009 - 16:15:01 EEST