fons@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:16:58PM +0100, Folderol wrote:
>
>> Very interesting information. It's fascinating how complicated something
>> like a 'simple' metering system is!
>
> Well, it's not really complicated...
>
> 'Traditional' VU meters had no active electronics
> at all, just a bridge rectifier and a resistor. The
> dynamic response was determined only by the mechanics
> of the meter. This means that a 'real' mechanical VU
> was not just a V or A meter with a different scale,
> it had to be engineered to have the right response.
>
> Now such a moving coil meter is just a classic mass +
> spring + damping system, which corresponds to a second
> order low pass filter. So to get the correct response
> from a software VU you take the absolute value of the
> signal and apply the low pass filter. For a VU the
> filter was defined in the time domain: with a step
> input It should reach 99% of the final value in 300ms,
> overshoot to between 101% and 101.5%, and finally
> come to rest at 100%. The overshoot means sub-critical
> damping, so the filter is 'ringing' (but not much).
> The -3dB frequency for a VU filter is around 2Hz.
>
> The filter used in jkmeter is similar, but has exactly
> critical damping, it does not overshoot, and the -3dB
> frequency is around 1Hz. The other difference is that
> the input to the filter is not the absolute value of
> the signal but the square of it. This means you can't
> direclty compare the 'speed'. For short signals (less
> than 125 ms) the K meter is faster than a VU would be,
> for longer ones it is a bit slower, and it also falls
> back slower than a VU. If anyone is interested in the
> exact time and frequency domain curves just ask off-
> list.
I started off my working life with 17 years in radio broadcasting, so the
"traditional" vu meter and it's rigidly defined characteristics were very
much a staple of life. I think that experience still colours my thinking.
Just to drift back to the zyn/yoshi metering for a moment - with 0.031
I've gone back to the standard zyn characteristics, and just eliminated
the need to grab the master lock. I think it's better now.
Thank you Fons, your generosity in sharing your knowledge is very much
appreciated.
cheers, Cal
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Oct 25 00:15:01 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Oct 25 2009 - 00:15:02 EEST