Re: [LAU] qjackctl gets confused when used through ssh -X

From: <fons@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat Oct 31 2009 - 12:38:37 EET

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 09:04:20PM -0500, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:

> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
>
> >>>- Single application instance restriction option added (X11).
>
> Strictly speaking, this says that if you use the command line
> switch... then it will _enable_ the single application instance
> restriction.
>
> >now, "Single application instance" means that you now have an option to
> >turn off that dreaded x11 uniqueness restriction you pissed about.
>
> And here you are saying that it does the _opposite_. (The switch
> _disables_ the restriction.)
>
> >good news are, your choice will prevail. until you decide otherwise, of
> >course. unlikely but feasible, ntl
>
> And now are you saying that it's a _toggle_ ??
>
> >may i quit medication now? :))
>
> Can I have some of that? :-))

Don't take it ! And Rui, quit it ! Now !
That medication is AFAICS the only way to explain
the existence of this restriction' :-).

No rational motivation for it was ever offered,
it looks just like an arbitraty way to reduce
functionality. Qjackctl has been working quite
nicely without it for five years or so.

Ciao,

-- 
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat Oct 31 16:15:01 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 31 2009 - 16:15:02 EET